IN RE: DUANE CRITHFIELD (2011)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: DUANE CRITHFIELD, Relator

No. 05-11-00289-CV

Decided: March 17, 2011

Before Justices Morris, Francis, and Myers

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 09-02916-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Myers

The Court has before it relator's emergency motion for temporary relief. The Court DENIES the motion. The Court also has before it relator's petition for writ of mandamus. Relator contends the trial judge erred in ordering him to produce certain documents. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown that the trial court abused its discretion. See K Mart Corp. v. Sanderson, 937 S.W.2d 429, 431 (Tex.1996) (orig.proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network