IN RE: MARIO SINACOLA & SONS EXCAVATING (2011)

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004-01398-2010

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Lang

Relator contends the trial judge erred in compelling responses to certain discovery requests and ordering sanctions against relator.   The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein.   Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested with respect to the discovery requests.   See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a);  Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992).   As to the sanctions, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy by appeal.   See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig.proceeding).  Finally, we conclude relators' petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.   See Tex.R.App. P. 52.3(j);  In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding).   Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.

110169F.P05