Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
KIMBERLY QUINTANA, Appellant v. CROSSFIT DALLAS, L.L.C. D/B/A CROSSFIT PLANO AND TROY DODSON, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By letter dated July 28, 2010, the Court notified appellant her brief was deficient and did not satisfy the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(k). Appellant was directed to file, within ten days, an amended brief correcting the deficiencies and was warned that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). To date, appellant has neither filed an amended brief nor otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 43.2(f).
100146F.P05
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 05-10-00146-CV
Decided: January 10, 2011
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)