Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Susan Cohen Mandell APPELLANT v. Harold Lance Mandell APPELLEE
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Susan Cohen Mandell appeals the trial court's November 12, 2008 order granting Appellee Harold Lance Mandell's postjudgment motion to enforce the division of the marital estate provided in the couple's April 8, 2008 divorce decree. The notice of appeal from the divorce decree was filed in this court on July 7, 2008, we issued our opinion on April 15, 2010, and mandate issued November 16, 2010.2 The appeal from the divorce decree was therefore pending when the trial court rendered its enforcement order.
Section 9.007(c) of the family code provides that the power of the trial court “to render further orders to assist in the implementation of or to clarify the property division is abated while an appellate proceeding is pending.” 3 Accordingly, this court requested that the parties file supplemental letter briefs addressing the impact of this statute on this case.
As both parties agree, under the statute, the trial court had no power to render the November 12, 2008 enforcement order because the appeal from the divorce decree was then pending.4 Accordingly, we vacate the trial court's November 12, 2008 enforcement order, and, because mandate has now issued in the appeal from the divorce decree, we remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.5
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 16, 2010
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
FN2. Mandell v. Mandell, 310 S.W.3d 531 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, pet. denied).. FN2. Mandell v. Mandell, 310 S.W.3d 531 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, pet. denied).
FN3. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.007(c) (Vernon 2006).. FN3. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.007(c) (Vernon 2006).
FN4. See id.; In re Fischer-Stoker, 174 S.W.3d 268, 271 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding) (op. on reh'g).. FN4. See id.; In re Fischer-Stoker, 174 S.W.3d 268, 271 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, orig. proceeding) (op. on reh'g).
FN5. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.007(c); Fischer-Stoker, 174 S.W.3d at 271.. FN5. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 9.007(c); Fischer-Stoker, 174 S.W.3d at 271.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 02-09-00032-CV
Decided: December 16, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)