IN RE: PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND STEVE ADAMS (2010)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

IN RE: PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND STEVE ADAMS, Relators

No. 05-10-01439-CV

Decided: December 07, 2010

Before Justices Morris, Lang, and Myers

Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-10-02190-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice Lang

Relators contend the trial court erred in denying their motion to abate. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex.1992). Additionally, relators' petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relators' petition for writ of mandamus.

101439F.P05

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network