Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gary Dwayne Oatman, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant's brief was originally due in December 2009. After four extensions of time, the filing date was August 16, 2010. The brief has not been received and appellant's appointed attorney, Scott K. Stevens, did not respond to this Court's notice that the brief is overdue.
The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether the attorney it appointed to represent appellant has abandoned the appeal.1 Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter's notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than December 17, 2010. Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(b)(3).
Abated
FOOTNOTES
FN1. On April 16, 2010, counsel filed a motion to withdraw saying he was too busy to handle the appeal. Unwilling to leave the indigent appellant without counsel, the Court directed counsel to seek permission to withdraw from the trial court, which could immediately appoint substitute counsel. We infer that counsel did not do this, and he later filed his fourth motion for extension of time.. FN1. On April 16, 2010, counsel filed a motion to withdraw saying he was too busy to handle the appeal. Unwilling to leave the indigent appellant without counsel, the Court directed counsel to seek permission to withdraw from the trial court, which could immediately appoint substitute counsel. We infer that counsel did not do this, and he later filed his fourth motion for extension of time.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03-09-00587-CR
Decided: December 01, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)