GISELLE BORBON FORMERLY RODRIGUEZ v. SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ AND DAVID ECKMAN (2010)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

----------- GISELLE BORBON (FORMERLY RODRIGUEZ), Appellant v. SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ AND DAVID ECKMAN, Appellees

NO. 01-10-00153-CV

Decided: November 10, 2010

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Alcala, and Sharp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Giselle Borbon (formerly Rodriguez), has neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Tex. Gov't Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (Vernon Supp.2004) (listing fees in court of appeals); Fees Civ. Cases B(1), (3) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant, Giselle Borbon (formerly Rodriguez), did not adequately respond. See Tex.R.App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss this appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. All pending motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network