TIFFANY LAVON HAGWOOD v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (2010)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion By Justice Fillmore

Tiffany Lavon Hagwood appeals her conviction for aggravated robbery.   Punishment was assessed at thirty years' imprisonment.

Hagwood's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.   The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).   The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance.   See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).   Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Hagwood.   We advised Hagwood she has a right to file a pro se response.   Hagwood, however, did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief.   See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex.Crim.App.2005).   We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit.   We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE