IN RE: LANIER WORLDWIDE (2010)

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Lanier Worldwide, Inc. (“Lanier”), seeks mandamus relief compelling the trial court to rule on its motion to appoint a receiver.

On June 11, 2010, Lanier moved to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.   We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus.   All outstanding motions are overruled as moot.

FOOTNOTES

FN1. The underlying case is Lanier Worldwide, Inc., v. Charles Brown L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership, d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm;  Charles Brown P.L.L.C., a Texas professional limited liability corporation, d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm;  Charles Brown P.C., a Texas professional corporation d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm, P.G., L.P., a Texas limited partnership;  and Charles Brown, an Individual, No.2004-18779 in the 215th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Steven E. Kirkland, presiding..  FN1. The underlying case is Lanier Worldwide, Inc., v. Charles Brown L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership, d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm;  Charles Brown P.L.L.C., a Texas professional limited liability corporation, d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm;  Charles Brown P.C., a Texas professional corporation d/b/a The Charles Brown Law Firm, P.G., L.P., a Texas limited partnership;  and Charles Brown, an Individual, No.2004-18779 in the 215th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Hon. Steven E. Kirkland, presiding.

Per Curiam