Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JEWARA O. DILLARD APPELLANT v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL APPELLEE ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING AND RESIDENTIAL FINANCE TRUST MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET- BACKED CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-BC4
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING1
The court has considered “Appellee's Motion To Dismiss.” In considering this motion to dismiss, the court took into account the following procedural background.
Appellant Jewara O. Dillard, proceeding pro se, timely filed her notice of appeal, and her briefing deadline was set for December 17, 2009. An extension was granted, and the brief was due February 1, 2010. Appellant failed to file a brief, and this appeal was dismissed.
Appellant thereafter filed a motion to reconsider, which we treated as a motion for rehearing and granted after reviewing a response from Appellee. In our order granting Appellant's motion to reconsider, we withdrew our prior opinion and judgment and ordered her brief due on or before April 15, 2010.
Appellant failed to meet the April 15, 2010 deadline and instead filed a motion to extend the time to file her brief. We granted the motion, stating that Appellant “shall file appellant's brief on Wednesday, May 26, 2010. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.” Appellant failed to file her brief by that deadline.
Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that “[s]ince the Appellant failed to file a Brief and has failed on two occasions to comply with orders from this honorable Court, this Court should dismiss this appeal.” Because Appellant's brief has not been filed, we grant Appellee's motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
SUE WALKER JUSTICE
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2-09-327-CV
Decided: June 17, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)