TERRENCE ANTHONY ROUNDTREE v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (2010)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Justice O'Neill

Terrence Anthony Roundtree appeals his conviction for imposition of sentence pursuant to a plea of not true to a motion to adjudicate his community supervision.   His underlying offense was aggravated assault against a public servant.   Punishment was assessed at ninety-nine years in the penitentiary.

Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.   The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).   The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance.   See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).   Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant.   We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response.   Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief.   We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit.   We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL JUSTICE