MICHAEL JONES JR v. THE STATE OF TEXAS (2010)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

MICHAEL JONES, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

No. 05-08-01314-CR

Decided: June 10, 2010

Before Justices Richter, Lang-Miers, and Myers

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion By Justice Richter

MICHAEL JONES, JR. appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Punishment was assessed at life imprisonment.

Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

MARTIN RICHTER JUSTICE

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network