Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure, Appellants v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
In October 2009, the trial court found that appellants Tabetha Seiler and David Vidaure were not indigent and signed orders removing their appointed attorneys from the case. In December we informed appellants that the reporter's record was overdue. In February, we informed them that their briefs were overdue and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if the briefs were not filed by March 8, 2010. To date, appellants have not filed a brief, paid their fees, arranged for the reporter's record to be filed, or communicated with this Court in any fashion. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(b).
David Puryear, Justice
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 03-09-00562-CV
Decided: May 28, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)