Relator v. << (2010)

Conclusion

/s/

FOOTNOTES

FN1. Relator further asserts that the contempt order is void because the associate judge lacked the authority to hear the motion for enforcement in light of Cassie's objection in her motion to the associate judge hearing the matter.   Because we hold that the contempt order is void due to relator's failure to knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel, we need not address this argument..  FN1. Relator further asserts that the contempt order is void because the associate judge lacked the authority to hear the motion for enforcement in light of Cassie's objection in her motion to the associate judge hearing the matter.   Because we hold that the contempt order is void due to relator's failure to knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel, we need not address this argument.

FN2. A void contempt order cannot support the revocation order.   In her response to relator's petition, Cassie concedes that the revocation order is void.   We, nonetheless, address this argument..  FN2. A void contempt order cannot support the revocation order.   In her response to relator's petition, Cassie concedes that the revocation order is void.   We, nonetheless, address this argument.

Justice