Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DAVID JOYNER APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant David Joyner is attempting to appeal from the trial court's denial of his pretrial motion to recuse. An interlocutory order denying a motion to recuse is not appealable. Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260, 260-61 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 43.2(f); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
PER CURIAM
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: NO. 2-09-355-CV
Decided: January 14, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)