IN THE INTEREST OF CHILD v. << (2010)

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.K., A CHILD

NO. 2-09-412-CV

Decided: January 14, 2010

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

On December 8, 2009 and December 21, 2009, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex.R.App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of August 28, 2007,² we dismiss the appeal. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See Tex.R.App. P. 43.4.

FOOTNOTES

FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.

FN2. See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).. FN2. See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing fees in courts of appeals).

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network