Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BASSAM MUHAMMED NAJEM APPELLANT v. TAHIR YASIN AL-SEBAHI APPELLEE
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
Appellant Bassam Muhammed Najem attempts to appeal from the trial court's final judgment in favor of Appellee Tahir Yasin Al-Sebahi. The trial court's judgment was signed on February 27, 2009. Najem's notice of appeal was therefore due either March 30, 2009, for a direct appeal or August 27, 2009, for a restricted appeal, but it was not filed until November 12, 2009. See Tex.R.App. P. 26.1, 26.1(c).
On November 30, 2009, we notified Najem of our concern that this court may not have jurisdiction over the appeal and informed him that unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2 See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. We have received no response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
FOOTNOTES
FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.. FN1. See Tex.R.App. P. 47.4.
FN2. We further notified Najem that the notice of appeal is defective and directed him to file an amended notice of appeal because the notice does not state the date of the judgment or the order appealed from, state the court to which the appeal is being taken, and include a certificate of service indicating that the notice of appeal has been served on all parties to the trial court judgment. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.1(d)(2), (4), 25.1(e).. FN2. We further notified Najem that the notice of appeal is defective and directed him to file an amended notice of appeal because the notice does not state the date of the judgment or the order appealed from, state the court to which the appeal is being taken, and include a certificate of service indicating that the notice of appeal has been served on all parties to the trial court judgment. See Tex.R.App. P. 25.1(d)(2), (4), 25.1(e).
PER CURIAM
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: NO. 2-09-406-CV
Decided: January 14, 2010
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)