PEOPLE v. CHANO (2020)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Juan Carlos CHANO, Appellant.

2017-2274 K CR

Decided: October 30, 2020

PRESENT: : MICHELLE WESTON, J.P., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ

Feldman and Feldman (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Christopher J. Robles, J.), rendered October 26, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [1] [a]), and imposed sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal (see Anders v. California, 386 US 738 [1967]). Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; People v. Murray, 169 AD3d 227 [2019]; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; People v. Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

WESTON, J.P., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law