Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John SIDORSKI, Appellant.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is reversed, on the law, the fine, if paid, is remitted, and the matter is remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.
The People charged defendant, in a simplified traffic information, with failing to stop at a stop sign (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1172 [a]). After having pleaded not guilty and having requested a trial, defendant and his attorney failed to appear for the scheduled trial, whereupon the court entered a judgment against defendant without conducting a trial, and imposed a fine. On appeal, defendant contends, among other things, that the default judgment was improper. We agree.
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1806-a (1) permits the entry of “a plea of guilty on behalf of the defendant” and the rendering of “a default judgment of a fine” to be entered against a defendant who has been charged with a traffic infraction but failed to “answer within the time specified,” which “judgment entered pursuant to default shall be civil in nature.” However, the statute expressly provides that “[w]hen a person has entered a plea of not guilty and has demanded a hearing, no fine or penalty shall be imposed for any reason, prior to the holding of the hearing which shall be scheduled by the court.” As defendant pleaded not guilty to the charge and requested a trial, and since no trial was held before the court entered the default judgment, it must be reversed (see People v. Cucceraldo, 64 Misc 3d 30 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019], lv granted 34 NY3d 979 [2019]; People v. Iverson, 63 Misc 3d 163[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50930[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019], lv granted 34 NY3d 981 [2019]; People v. Cole, 63 Misc 3d 149[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50729[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2019]; People v. Hernandez, 62 Misc 3d 9 [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2018], lv denied 33 NY3d 1032 [2019]).
In view of the foregoing, defendant's remaining contention has been rendered academic (see Iverson, 63 Misc 3d 163[A], 2019 NY Slip Op 50930[U]).
Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is reversed and the matter is remitted to the District Court for all further proceedings.
ADAMS, P.J., TOLBERT and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2018-2580 S CR
Decided: February 27, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)