Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Adedoyin OLUBUMMO, Appellant.
ORDERED that the order entered March 22, 2018 is affirmed, without costs.
In 2005, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law former § 265.02 [4] ) and was subsequently sentenced to, among other things, six months in jail. In January 2018, defendant moved, pursuant to CPL 160.59, for an order sealing the record of his judgment of conviction. The People opposed the motion. By order entered March 22, 2018, the County Court summarily denied the motion.
At the outset, we note that even though defendant's motion related to a criminal matter, since it “does not affect the criminal judgment itself, but only a collateral aspect of it—namely, the sealing of the court record,” it is a civil matter (Matter of Hynes v. Karassik, 47 NY2d 659, 661 n 1 [1979]). Therefore, defendant was entitled to appeal as of right the order denying his motion (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]).
CPL 160.59 (1) (a) lists the types of criminal offenses that are “Eligible” to be sealed, which list does not include “a violent felony offense defined in section 70.02 of the penal law.” Contrary to the determination of the County Court, at the time of defendant's plea in 2005, Penal Law former § 265.02 (4) was defined as a violent felony offense pursuant to Penal Law former § 70.02 (1) (c) (see People v. Green, 62 AD3d 1024, 1025 [2009]). The County Court, however, correctly noted that Penal Law former § 265.02 (4) was subsequently replaced by Penal Law § 265.03 (3) (see id. at 1025), and we note that current Penal Law § 70.02 (1) (b), likewise, provides that Penal Law § 265.03 (3) is a violent felony offense. Consequently, defendant was not entitled to an order sealing the record of his judgment of conviction.
Accordingly, the order entered March 22, 2018 is affirmed.
TOLBERT, J.P., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2019-666 RO C
Decided: January 30, 2020
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)