Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel CHERRY, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered December 6, 2016, affirmed.
The verdict convicting defendant of occupying multiple seats on a subway car (see 21 NYCRR 1050.7[j][1] ) and placing a foot on a subway seat car (see 21 NYCRR 1050.7[j][2] ) was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the trier of fact and we find no reason on the record before us to disturb the court's determination to credit the police officers' eyewitness testimony that, in violation of New York City Transit Authority Rules, defendant was sleeping across multiple seats in a crowded subway car with his foot on a seat.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 570878 /16
Decided: October 22, 2019
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)