PEOPLE v. BROWN (2019)

Judgment of conviction (Marisol Martinez Alonso, J.), rendered April 30, 2018, affirmed.

The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. It charged all the elements of driving while intoxicated (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192[2]). Insofar as relevant, allegations that defendant was observed at “FDR Drive and East 95th Street,” “sitting in the driver's seat of a vehicle,” with the “keys in the ignition,” and with “no one else inside,” and that the vehicle was positioned “immediately behind a yellow taxi cab” which had a back door that was “dented such that it could not open,” were sufficient to support the inference that defendant was operating a motor vehicle (see People v. Esposito, 33 NY3d 1016 [2019], reversing 60 Misc 3d 60 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018]; see also People v. Alamo, 34 NY2d 453, 458-459 [1974]; People v. Almanzar, 113 AD3d 527 [2014], lv denied 23 NY3d 1059 [2014]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.