DENTICI v. SOUTH SHORE HYUNDAI (2019)

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the sum of $467.99, representing the money he had allegedly paid as an early termination fee for a lease on a vehicle. Defendant failed to appear for trial. At an inquest, plaintiff testified that defendant's employee had called him and told him that defendant wanted plaintiff's 2014 Hyundai Sonata leased car because it had such low mileage and that if he were to terminate the lease early, the termination fee would be waived. Plaintiff submitted the final bill from Hyundai Finance, which showed a balance due of $467.99, which was the difference between the adjusted capital cost and the realized value, less advanced lease payments. The amount listed on the form, next to the line which read Early Termination Fee, was $0. Following the inquest, the District Court dismissed the action.

In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether “substantial justice has ․ been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law” (UDCA 1807; see UDCA 1804; Ross v. Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v. Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). Upon a review of the record, we find that plaintiff did not meet his burden of establishing that he was charged an early termination fee. Consequently, the judgment dismissing the action, after an inquest, provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see UDCA 1804, 1807).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

ADAMS, P.J., TOLBERT and EMERSON, JJ., concur.