ARGUELLES v. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INDEMNIFICATION CORPORATION (2019)

ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the decision dated September 4, 2014 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered February 10, 2016 (see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Civil Court, after a nonjury trial, which dismissed the complaint.

The only witness at trial was an employee of defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC), who testified that plaintiff's assignor was not a covered person because plaintiff had not established that plaintiff's remedies against the owner of the vehicle had been exhausted. Specifically, plaintiff failed to establish lack of coverage of the vehicle in which plaintiff's assignor was a passenger at the time of the accident.

Plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against the vehicle's owner before seeking relief from MVAIC (see Hauswirth v. American Home Assur. Co., 244 AD2d 528 [1997]; Compas Med., P.C. v. MVAIC, 42 Misc 3d 150[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50414[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014] ). Here, plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies against the owner of the vehicle (see BLR Chiropractic, P.C. v. MVAIC, 33 Misc 3d 131[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51878[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]; see also BLR Chiropractic, P.C. v. MVAIC, 36 Misc 3d 129[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52517[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011] ).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.