Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gloria Melsere GARRAWAY, Appellant, v. Matthew James CUMMO, Respondent.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified by increasing the award in favor of plaintiff to the principal sum of $985.82; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the principal sum of $985.82 for damage to her car. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff testified that there were two left-turn lanes and that plaintiff's vehicle had been in the right one and defendant's vehicle had been in the left one during their simultaneous left turns. Plaintiff further testified that defendant had partially swerved into her lane, damaging the left side of her car's rear bumper, when both vehicles were making the left turns. Defendant testified that he did not leave his lane and that plaintiff had swerved into his lane while the cars were turning, causing the collision. He indicated that his car's right side bumper had come into contact with plaintiff's left side “quarter panel.” Plaintiff presented proof that her damages amounted to $985.82. Plaintiff appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment after trial awarding her the principal sum of only $492.91.
In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether “substantial justice has ․ been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law” (UDCA 1807; see UDCA 1804; Ross v. Friedman, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; Williams v. Roper, 269 AD2d 125 [2000] ). In awarding plaintiff exactly 50% of her established damages, the District Court's decision clearly constituted a compromise regarding liability for the accident. Upon a review of the record, we are of the opinion that plaintiff demonstrated that she was in her lane when her car was hit, without any fault on her part. Consequently, the judgment did not provide the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (see UDCA 1804, 1807).
Accordingly, the judgment is modified by increasing the award in favor of plaintiff to the principal sum of $985.82.
TOLBERT, J.P., BRANDS and RUDERMAN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2017-1999 N C
Decided: December 13, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)