Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Earl TATE, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered December 9, 2013, affirmed.
Defendant argues that the accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally defective as to the third-degree assault charge (Penal Law § 120.00) to which he pleaded guilty. Significantly, however, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the entire accusatory instrument. Since it cannot be said that no penological purpose would be served by remanding the matter to Criminal Court for further proceedings on the remaining class A misdemeanor offense (forcible touching) charged therein (see People v. Allen, 39 NY2d 916, 918 [1976] ), dismissal is not warranted and therefore we affirm on this basis.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 570111 /14
Decided: September 21, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)