PRECIOUS ACUPUNCTURE CARE v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY (2018)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

PRECIOUS ACUPUNCTURE CARE, P.C., as Assignee of Ana Tejada, Respondent, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

2015–2383 K C

Decided: June 01, 2018

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ.

Law Office of Goldstein & Flecker (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branch of defendant's cross motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action based upon a lack of medical necessity.

Upon a review of the record, we agree with the Civil Court's determination that there is a triable issue of fact regarding the medical necessity of the services at issue (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980] ).

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law