Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Khadeem J. Fraser, Appellant, v. Royal Shipping Lines US, LLC, Respondent.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the principal sum of $28,000 for, among other things, failure to pay wages. Following an inquest at which defendant failed to appear, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff the total sum of $3,300. Plaintiff appeals on the ground of inadequacy.
Where, as here, a defendant defaults in appearing and an inquest is conducted, it is still necessary for the plaintiff to present proof of damages at the inquest (see Oparaji v 245-02 Merrick Blvd, LLC, 149 AD3d 1091, 1092 [2017]; Paulson v Kotsilimbas, 124 AD2d 513, 514 [1986]; Bartlett v Rosenthal, 69 Misc 3d 138[A], 2020 NY Slip Op 51305[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020]; Fernandez v Atias, 50 Misc 3d 127[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51864[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]). Plaintiff testified at the inquest that defendant had given him a "home shipping job for a month" and "at the end of the month, I just wasn't paid" and submitted evidence that his fixed monthly payment was $3,300. Thus, plaintiff established a prima facie case as to damages in the sum of $3,300. As plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for any other alleged damages, the Civil Court properly awarded plaintiff only $3,300 (see Bartlett v Rosenthal, 2020 NY Slip Op 51305[U]; Fernandez v Atias, 2015 NY Slip Op 51864[U]; Dallas v United Airlines, Inc., 58 Misc 3d 152[A], 2018 NY Slip Op 50114[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018]; Jacobs v New York City Tr. Auth., 14 Misc 3d 130[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50022[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]; Raytsin v Household Bank, N.A., 6 Misc 3d 132[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50108[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2005]).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
TOUSSAINT, P.J., BUGGS and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 18, 2025
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2024-813 K C
Decided: July 18, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)