Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michele Paolillo, Appellant, v. Danielle McManus, Respondent, Arsene McManus, Tenant, "John Doe" and "Jane Doe", Undertenants.
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, without costs, and the branches of Danielle McManus's motion seeking to vacate so much of the default final judgment as awarded landlord the sum of $4,780 as against Danielle McManus and, upon such vacatur, for a hearing on the amount of rent due in a nonpayment summary proceeding are denied.
Landlord commenced this nonpayment proceeding in December 2018, and a final judgment awarding landlord possession and the sum of $4,780 was entered on January 4, 2019 upon the failure of both named respondents to appear in court. Daniellle McManus (tenant) satisfied the monetary part of the judgment by income execution. In October 2023, tenant moved to vacate so much of the default final judgment as awarded landlord the sum of $4,780 as against her, pursuant to the inherent discretionary power of the court to relieve a party from a judgment in the interest of substantial justice, and, upon such vacatur, for, in effect, restitution, or, in the alternative, a hearing limited to the issue of how much rent landlord was owed. In an order dated April 18, 2024, the Justice Court (Karen Sartain, J.) granted tenant's motion to the extent of vacating so much of the default final judgment as awarded landlord $4,780 as against tenant and setting the matter down for a "trial on the limited issue of rent due."
While a court has the inherent power to vacate its judgments in the interest of justice (see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]; Ladd v Stevenson, 112 NY 325, 332 [1889]), under the circumstances presented, we find that it was an improvident exercise of the Justice Court's discretion to grant the branch of tenant's motion seeking to vacate so much of the default final judgment as awarded landlord $4,780 as against tenant (see Epps v LaSalle Bus, Inc., 271 AD2d 400, 400 [2000]; Greenwich Sav. Bank v JAJ Carpet Mart, 126 AD2d 451, 452 [1987]; U.S. Equities Corp. v Bartolini, 82 Misc 3d 128[A], 2024 NY Slip Op 50396[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2024]).
Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the branches of tenant's motion seeking to vacate so much of the default final judgment as awarded landlord the sum of $4,780 as against tenant and, upon such vacatur, for a hearing on the amount of rent due in a nonpayment summary proceeding are denied.
GARGUILO, P.J., WALSH and CONWAY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 1, 2025
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2024-571 S C
Decided: May 01, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)