Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damayanta Linares, Appellant.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Defendant pleaded guilty to petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25), and, at the time of sentencing, a five-year final order of protection was issued in favor of the complainant. On appeal, defendant argues that this court should vacate the order of protection because the Criminal Court failed to articulate its reasons for the order's issuance (see CPL 530.13 [4]).
While an order of protection issued at the time of sentencing can be reviewed upon an appeal from the judgment of conviction (see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 315 [2004]), here, defendant's challenge to the final order of protection issued against her is unpreserved for appellate review because defendant failed to object to the issuance of the order of protection at sentencing and did not move to vacate or amend the order in the Criminal Court (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Nieves, 2 NY3d at 316-317; People v Tlatelpa, 76 Misc 3d 132[A], 2022 NY Slip Op 50912[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2022]; People v Etienne, 70 Misc 3d 144[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 50212[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2021]). We decline to review defendant's contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Colon, 204 AD3d 938, 939 [2022]; People v Rivera-Hernandez, 200 AD3d 721, 722 [2021]). We note that the Court of Appeals has stated that "the better practice—and best use of judicial resources—is for a defendant seeking adjustment of [a final order of protection] to request relief from the issuing court in the first instance," whereby the defendant "can expeditiously obtain correction of the order[ ] and, even if not successful, will have created a record that will facilitate appellate review" (People v Nieves, 2 NY3d at 317; see People v Martinez, 214 AD3d 1004, 1004 [2023]).
Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
TOUSSAINT, P.J., MUNDY and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 30, 2024
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022-831 Q CR
Decided: August 30, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)