Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
J.C. Healing Touch Rehab, P.C., as Assignee of Rodriguez, Horacio, Respondent, v. MVAIC, Appellant.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action had been commenced after the statute of limitations had expired, and plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment. By order dated February 1, 2023, the Civil Court denied MVAIC's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted plaintiff's cross-motion.
MVAIC's motion papers established, prima facie, that the action had been commenced after the expiration of the three-year statute of limitations (see Kings Highway Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC, 19 Misc 3d 69 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2008]; see also 6D Farm Corp. v Carr, 63 AD3d 903 [2009]; Island ADC, Inc. v Baldassano Architectural Group, P.C., 49 AD3d 815 [2008]). In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact as to the action's timeliness (see Precision Radiology Servs., P.C. v MVAIC, 34 Misc 3d 126[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52274[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]). To the extent that the Civil Court sua sponte held that MVAIC was estopped from interposing its defense that the action was barred by the statute of limitations, the record is bereft of facts to support such a determination (see Airco Alloys Div. v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 76 AD2d 68 [1980]).
In light of the foregoing, we reach no other issue.
Accordingly, the order is reversed, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.
TOUSSAINT, P.J., MUNDY and HOM, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: March 1, 2024
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023-835 K C
Decided: March 01, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)