Rachel Goetz, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Norman Lewis Barotz as administrator of the Estate of Madelaine Shapiro, and Norman Barotz, Defendants-Appellants. (2023)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

Rachel Goetz, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Norman Lewis Barotz as administrator of the Estate of Madelaine Shapiro, and Norman Barotz, Defendants-Appellants.

570016 /23

Decided: May 10, 2023

PRESENT: Hagler, P.J., Tisch, Michael, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Order (Debra Rose Samuels, J.), dated March 12, 2020, dismissed, without costs, as nonappealable.

Inasmuch as no appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Smith v Pereira, 176 AD3d 491, 492 [2019]) and no appeal has been taken from the original October 2, 2019 order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment, defendants' arguments addressed to that determination are not properly before us (see Stratakis v Ryjov, 66 AD3d 411, 411-412 [2009]).

Defendants' remaining contentions are unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: May 10, 2023

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network