Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EDJ REALTY INC., Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, v. Phyllis SODANO, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent, Joseph Sodano, a/k/a Joey Sodano, “John Doe” & “Jane Doe,” Respondents.
Order (Brenda S. Spears, J.), dated February 19, 2019, reversed, with $10 costs, the petition reinstated and the matter remanded to Civil Court for further proceedings, including a hearing to determine the amount of use and occupancy and reasonable attorneys' fees due landlord. Appeal from order (same court and Judge), dated October 2, 2018, dismissed, without costs, as academic.
The February 19, 2019 order, which denied landlord's motion, in effect, to vacate or modify a prior order which was not the result of a motion made on notice, is “subject to full appellate review on the merits” (Lamot v. City of New York, 297 AD2d 527 [2002]).
Tenant's voluntary vacatur during the pendency of the holdover proceeding did not deprive the court of jurisdiction over the monetary claims contained in the petition, including use and occupancy and attorneys' fees (see Mauer-Bach Realty LLC v Gomez, 43 Misc 3d 141[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50845[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2014]). In dismissing the monetary claims without prejudice to landlord's commencement of a plenary action, Civil Court relied upon a vaguely described stipulation that was never raised by the parties below (or on appeal), and is not in the record.
With respect to attorneys' fees, tenant's determination not to contest the merits of the underlying holdover proceeding resulted in an ultimate outcome wholly favorable to landlord since it obtained the central relief sought, i.e. possession, by reason of tenant's surrender of the unregulated apartment (see Soho Vil. Realty v Gaffney, 188 Misc 2d 261 [App Term, 1st Dept 2001]). In these circumstances, landlord qualifies as a prevailing party entitled to its reasonable attorneys' fees under the lease agreement (see Stribula v Tisdale, 21 Misc 3d 137 [A], 2008 NY Slip Op. 52239[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2008]). We make no determination with respect to the merits of landlord's remaining claims.
All concur
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570143 /17
Decided: February 22, 2022
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)