Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
J.H. GOLDMAN, A.H. Goldman, A.P. Goldman, D.G. Kemper as Executors for the Estate of Lillian Goldman and Lillian Goldman Family L.L.C. c/o LGF Enterprises, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, v. Ashley WENDELL, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant, Samantha Kennis, “John Doe,” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents.
Order (Anne Katz, J.), entered August 28, 2019, reversed, with $10 costs, tenant's application for attorneys' fees granted and matter remanded to Civil Court for a hearing to determine the reasonable value of attorneys' fees due tenant. Appeal from order (Anne Katz, J.), entered December 10, 2019 dismissed, without costs, as nonappealable.
Upon the trial of this illegal sublet holdover proceeding, Civil Court dismissed the petition, finding that tenant had complied with the requisites of Real Property Law (RPL) § 226-b(2) in requesting to sublease her stabilized apartment and that landlord “unreasonably withheld its consent” in “bad faith.” No appeal was taken from this determination. In this posture, Civil Court erred in failing to award tenant attorneys' fees. Irrespective of any lease provision authorizing an award of attorneys' fees, RPL § 226-b (2)(c) expressly provides that where a landlord unreasonably withholds consent to a tenant's request to sublet premises, the tenant “․ may recover the costs of the proceeding and attorneys fees if it is found that the owner acted in bad faith by withholding consent” (see 72nd St. Assoc. v Pyle, 105 AD2d 607 [1984], appeal dismissed 64 NY2d 774 [1985]). Accordingly, we remand for a determination of tenant's reasonable attorneys' fees.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
All concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570139 /21
Decided: November 01, 2021
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)