PEOPLE v. PROCTOR (2020)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Allen PROCTOR, Defendant-Appellant.

570424 /16

Decided: January 15, 2020

PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Cooper, J.

Judgment of conviction (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), rendered June 16, 2016, as amended November 4, 2016, affirmed.

In view of defendant's knowing waiver of his right to prosecution by information, the facial sufficiency of the accusatory instrument must be assessed under the standard required of a misdemeanor complaint (see People v. Dumay, 23 NY3d 518, 521 [2014]). So viewed, the accusatory instrument charging theft of services (see Penal Law § 165.15[3]) was jurisdictionally valid. Defendant's “unjustifiable failure or refusal to pay” the “lawful charge” for “public transportation service” (Penal Law § 165.15[3]) is reasonably inferred from allegations that he entered a municipal bus “without paying the requisite fare” and without “permission or authority” (see People v. Polanco, 162 AD3d 434 [2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 940 [2018]; People v. Walker, 43 Misc 3d 142[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 50849[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 1123 [2015]).

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network