Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Rehmat KHATTAK, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Ann E. Scherzer, J.) rendered December 21, 2016, affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007] ), which included the testimony of the victim and two plainclothes police officers who witnessed the underlying subway incident. There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of the victim's testimony and minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the officers.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570019 /17
Decided: November 26, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)