Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James BIRTH, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Carol R. Sharpe, J.), rendered February 10, 2014, affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his present challenge to the issuance of the order of protection, since he did not raise the issue at sentencing or move to vacate the order on the specific ground that he raises on appeal (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Nieves, 2 NY3d 310, 316–318 [2004]; People v. Gordon, 132 AD3d 531, 531 [2015], lv denied 26 NY3d 1109 [2016]; People v. Remington, 90 AD3d 678, 679 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 961 [2012] ). We decline to review this unpreserved claim in the interest of justice.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570263 /14
Decided: June 22, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)