TRIBORO PHARMACY INC v. SINGH (2018)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

TRIBORO PHARMACY INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Bikram SINGH, Esq., Defendant–Respondent.

570205 /18

Decided: June 18, 2018

PRESENT: Ling–Cohan, J.P., Cooper, Edmead, JJ.

Judgment (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about January 9, 2018, affirmed, without costs.

The record and ends of “substantial justice” (CCA 1807) support the dismissal, after trial, of this small claims action. Plaintiff failed to establish that it was entitled to a further refund of the fees previously paid to defendant-attorney in connection with legal services defendant was hired to perform. Defendant's testimony, credited by the court, established the number and reasonableness of the hours he expended on plaintiff's behalf. We note that defendant had already voluntarily refunded more than one-third of the legal fees paid by plaintiff.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network