KARINA ACUPUNCTURE v. PHOENIX INS CO (2018)

Order (David B. Cohen, J.), entered September 30, 2015, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's no-fault claims for acupuncture needle reinsertion services by demonstrating that it timely and properly denied the claims based on the assignor's sworn statement denying that such services were performed upon him. In opposition, plaintiff's proof, essentially consisting of an attorney's affirmation, was insufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether the needle reinsertions were actually performed.

Defendant was also entitled to summary judgment dismissing the balance of plaintiff's claims. Since it is undisputed that plaintiff did not fully respond to defendant's verification request, the thirty-day period to pay or deny the claims did not begin to run. Thus, the remaining claims were not overdue and plaintiff's action on those claims is premature (see e.g. St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v. Country Wide Ins. Co., 80 AD3d 599, 600 [2011]; Westchester County Med. Ctr. v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 262 AD2d 553 [1999] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unpersuasive.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.