PEOPLE v. MORALES (2018)

Judgment of conviction (Heidi C. Cesare, J.), rendered, June 15, 2017, affirmed.

The verdict convicting the defendant of attempted forcible touching (see Penal Law §§ 110/130.52[1] ) and sexual abuse in the third degree (see Penal Law § 130.55) was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determination concerning credibility. The credited testimony of the victim, as corroborated to a substantial degree by testimony from two plain-clothes police officers, established that defendant positioned himself directly behind the victim, a stranger to him, as the victim was observing the Rockefeller Plaza Christmas tree, and repeatedly thrust his groin against the victim's buttocks, rubbing back and forth, until she moved away to another location. Defendant then followed the victim and after once again positioning himself directly behind her, repeatedly thrust his groin against her buttocks. The trial court could rationally infer that defendant engaged in “sexual contact” when he touched the victim's buttocks and that such touching was “for the purpose of gratifying [defendant's] sexual desire” (see Penal Law § 130.00[3]; People v. Williams, 94 AD3d 1555 [2012] ). Regarding forcible touching, it could be inferred from the evidence that defendant had a motive to abuse or degrade the victim, and there was no legitimate purpose for his acts (see Penal Law § 130.55[1]; Matter of Traekwon I., 152 AD3d 431, 432 [2017] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.