Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clemence GERARD, Defendant–Appellant.
Judgment of conviction (Steven J. Hornstein, J.), rendered February 13, 2015, affirmed.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348—349 [2007] ). There is no basis for disturbing the trial court's determinations concerning credibility. The victim's testimony was corroborated, in part, by a second witness, the 911 call and medical records. The issues raised by defendant concerning minor inconsistencies in the testimony, the purported lack of physical evidence of the victim's injuries, and her alleged motive to fabricate her allegations were placed before the trier of fact, and we find no reason on the record before us to disturb its determination.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Per Curiam.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570383 /15
Decided: May 22, 2018
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)