148 LLC v. “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents. (2018)

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,

W 148 LLC, v. Lisa N. MCCRACKEN, Respondent–Appellant, “John Doe” and “Jane Doe,” Respondents.

570789 /17

Decided: May 22, 2018

PRESENT: Gonzalez, J.P., Edmead, J.

Order (Laurie L. Lau, J.), dated August 25, 2017, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs.

Respondent McCracken's cross motion for reciprocal discovery in connection with her succession claim was properly denied. Respondent failed to demonstrate “ample need” for discovery to ascertain petitioner's knowledge of her residence in the apartment (see Ludor Props. L.L.C. v. De Brito, 48 Misc 3d 142[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51261 [App Term, 1st Dept 2015]; Valor Realty LLC v. Ragno, 26 Misc 3d 132[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 50062[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2010]; see also New York Univ. v. Farkas, 121 Misc 2d 643, 647 [1983]). The facts relevant to respondent's succession claim, such as her residence in the apartment and the period of co-occupancy with the now-deceased rent controlled tenant, are peculiarly within respondent's own knowledge (see generally 656 W. Realty, LLC v. Blanco, 32 Misc 3d 128[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51254[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2011] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

Per Curiam.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network