Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jinyu Wang, Defendant-Appellant.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered January 16, 2019, modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the mandatory surcharge and fees, and otherwise affirmed.
Since defendant waived prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument is assessed under the reasonable cause standard applicable to a misdemeanor complaint (see People v Dumay, 23 NY3d 518, 522 [2014]). So viewed, the accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally valid because it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of unlawful possession of personal identification information in the third degree, pursuant to Penal Law § 190.81, which makes it illegal to "knowingly possess[ ]" another person's "credit card account number or code," among other personal identification information, while "knowing such information is intended to be used in furtherance of the commission of a crime defined in this chapter." The factual allegations that, upon defendant's July 10, 2018 arrest on another matter, police discovered personal identifying information of two individuals, including names and credit card numbers, on defendant's cell phone, and that neither individual gave defendant authority to possess such information, supplied "defendant with sufficient notice of the charged crime to satisfy the demands of due process and double jeopardy" (People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, 103 [2010]). Contrary to defendant's present contention, the pleaded facts, including defendant's possession of credit card information of two individuals without consent, support a reasonable inference that defendant intended to use such information in furtherance of the commission of an offense.
Based on our own interest of justice powers and the People's consent, we vacate the surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing (see People v Chirinos, 190 AD3d 434 [2021]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: December 18, 2023
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 570237 /19
Decided: December 18, 2023
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York,
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)