Skip to main content

STATE v. BOSTON (2023)

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

The STATE, Respondent, v. Darell Oneil BOSTON, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000549

Decided: March 01, 2023

David Nelson Lyon, of Duff, Freeman, Lyon, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Boston, 433 S.C. 177, 857 S.E.2d 27 (Ct. App. 2021). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.1

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   Counsel for Petitioner handled this appeal as part of the Appellate Practice Project. We applaud the professional ability of counsel and admire his willingness to volunteer his time and efforts in representing Petitioner.

PER CURIAM:

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law
STATE v. BOSTON (2023)

Docket No: Appellate Case No. 2021-000549

Decided: March 01, 2023

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Learn more about the law
Copied to clipboard