Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Allan Riley HOLMES, Petitioner.
ORDER
By opinion dated August 14, 2013, Petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for a period of nine months. In re Holmes, 405 S.C. 174, 747 S.E.2d 492 (2013). After referral to the Committee on Character and Fitness, the Committee has filed a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court reinstate Petitioner to the practice of law subject to the conditions of reinstatement set forth in this Court's 2013 opinion.
We find Petitioner has met the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE, to be reinstated as a regular member of the South Carolina Bar. Therefore, we grant the petition for reinstatement upon the following conditions:
(1) Petitioner must enter into a three-year monitoring agreement with Lawyers Helping Lawyers (LHL);
(2) Petitioner must fully comply with appropriate treatment for his addiction for three years from the date of reinstatement;
(3) For three years from the date of reinstatement, Petitioner must submit three reports to the Commission on Lawyer Conduct each quarter, including an affidavit of compliance with the terms of his LHL contract and with the recommendations of his treatment provider; a statement from his LHL monitor regarding Petitioner's compliance with the LHL contract; and a report of Petitioner's diagnosis, treatment compliance and prognosis from Petitioner's treatment provider;
(4) After the three-year period concludes, Petitioner must have his progress and compliance reviewed by an investigative panel of the Commission to determine whether the LHL contract and reporting requirements should be renewed, and if so, for how long; and
(5) Upon reinstatement, Petitioner must limit his practice to working for a law firm or other organization for at least one year, and if at the conclusion of that year he desires to become a solo practitioner, he will be permitted to do so only upon the approval of an investigative panel of the Commission.
s/ Donald W. Beatty, C.J.
s/ John W. Kittredge, J.
s/ John Cannon Few, J.
s/ George C. James, Jr., J.
s/ D. Garrison Hill, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Appellate Case No. 2023-000054
Decided: November 15, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)