Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TIMOTHY A. REESE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS THE TREASURER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION REFORM AND SIMON CAMPBELL, PRESIDENT, GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 13, AFL-CIO; FEDERATION OF STATE, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALS, LOCAL 2383AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS PENNSYLVANIA, AFL-CIO; AND UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1776, AFL-CIO, Intervenors PETITION OF: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 13, AFL-CIO; FEDERATION OF STATE, CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALS, LOCAL 2383AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS PENNSYLVANIA, AFL-CIO; AND UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1776, AFL-CIO, Intervenors
DISSENTING STATEMENT
I respectfully dissent from the grant of this Petition for Review, as the majority offers no indication that it has applied the standard governing review of the Commonwealth Court's discretionary decision to deny certification of a non-final order for interlocutory appeal by permission. Upon application of that controlling standard – which requires an assessment of whether such denial was so egregious as to justify prerogative appellate correction, see Pa.R.A.P. 1311, Note – I find nothing egregious in the Commonwealth Court's denial. Indeed, to the degree that the refusal to certify could be considered egregious, I believe it would be salutary for this Court to provide some guiding explanation pertaining to the irregularity, so that courts of original jurisdiction may prospectively conform to this Court's expectations.
CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR
Justice Mundy joins this dissenting statement.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 82 MM 2016
Decided: November 10, 2016
Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)