K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent (2011)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent

No. 393 MAL 2011

Decided: July 12, 2011

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12 th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, are:

1. Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintiff/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?

2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network