K.E.M., Petitioner v. P.C.S., Respondent (2011)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12 th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED.   The issues, are:

1.  Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintiff/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?

2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?

PER CURIAM