LIBERTY MUTUAL AND OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC THE INGERMAN GROUP AND CHATHAM APARTMENT ASSOCIATES BY AND THROUGH THEIR ASSIGNEE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND INGERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC BY AND THROUGH ITS ASSIGNEE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND OHIO CASUALTY GROUP IN ITS OWN RIGHT v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY (2010)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

LIBERTY MUTUAL, D/B/A AND T/A OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND INGERMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC., THE INGERMAN GROUP AND CHATHAM APARTMENT ASSOCIATES, L.P. BY AND THROUGH THEIR ASSIGNEE OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND INGERMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. BY AND THROUGH ITS ASSIGNEE, OHIO CASUALTY GROUP AND OHIO CASUALTY GROUP IN ITS OWN RIGHT, Petitioners v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent

No. 394 EAL 2010

Decided: December 17, 2010

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17 th day of December 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is denied.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law