LONG v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST PRISON SUPERVISION (2025)

Supreme Court of Oregon,

Brandon LONG, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent on Review.

(SC S070436)

Decided: January 16, 2025

Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender. Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner on review. Also on the briefs were Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

This case involves a challenge to the calculation of petitioner's post-prison supervision. We accepted review in this case at the same time that we accepted review in Kragt v. Board of Parole, 373 Or. 191, ––– P.3d –––– (Jan 16, 2025), which we also decided today. According to petitioner, “[t]he question presented in this case is identical to the second question presented in Kragt.” We agree with that assessment of the argument. In Kragt, we affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals, rejecting the same argument that petitioner raises in this case. Accordingly, our resolution here is fully controlled by Kragt.

The decision of the Court of Appeals and the final order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law