STATE v. LEUCK (2022)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank LEUCK, Defendant-Appellant.

A170900 (Control), A170901

Decided: March 23, 2022

Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge.

Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Kyle Krohn, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

A jury found defendant guilty of attempted assault of a public safety officer, ORS 161.405 and ORS 163.208, and resisting arrest, ORS 162.315, arising out of a fracas when a Burns police officer arrested him for violating a restraining order. On appeal, defendant raises two assignments of error that challenge the trial court's instructions to the jury. We reject his first assignment of error without discussion. Defendant's second assignment of error is foreclosed by our recent decision in State v. Prophet, 318 Or. App. 330, ––– P.3d –––– (2022) (concluding that the trial court did not err in refusing to give the defendant's proposed instruction because ORS 162.315 does not require that a defendant intentionally create a substantial risk of harm).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network